Forecasting Product Returns, Supply Chain Agility and Reverse Logistics Performance in the Textile Firms: Structural Equation Modelling


  • Hafiz Zeeshan Haider KUBS


Accuracy in Forecasting, Supply Chain Agility, Factors Influencing Forecasting, Environmental Performance, Social Performance.


The current research objective was to examine the impact of factors influencing forecasting, accuracy in forecasting, and supply chain agility (SCA) on the economic performance, environmental performance, and social performance of Karachi's manufacturing firms Pakistan. The quantitative approach using purposive sampling was used for data collection. The final sample for analysis was 144, and PLS-SEM using SmartPLS 3.2.8 was used in the study. The results have shown that accuracy in forecasting has a positive and significant effect on SCA. The factors influencing forecasting have a positive and significant impact on accuracy in forecasting. The SCA has a positive and significant impact on economic performance. The SCA has a positive and significant effect on environmental performance. The SCA has a positive and significant impact on social performance. The findings show that forecasting accuracy is influenced by a range of variables, depending on the market and demographics, creating a somewhat different scenario. Accuracy in forecasting is important for RL performance and plays an important role in RL planning.


Abdul-Rashid, S.H., Sakundarini, N., Ghazilla, R.A.R., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

Agrawal, S., & Singh, R.K. (2019). Forecasting product returns and reverse logistics performance: Structural equation modelling. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

Agrawal, S., Singh, R.K., & Murtaza, Q. (2015). A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 76-92.

Ahmed, W., & Najmi, A. (2018). Developing and analyzing framework for understanding the effects of gscm on green and economic performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

Alghababsheh, M. (2018). The implementation of socially sustainable supply chain management in the uk manufacturing sector: A social capital perspective. Brunel University London.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57-78): Routledge.

Choi, Y.S., & Lim, U. (2017). Contextual factors affecting the innovation performance of manufacturing smes in korea: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 9(7), 1193.

Connelly, L.M. (2014). Ethical considerations in research studies. Medsurg Nursing, 23(1), 54.

Devika, K., Jafarian, A., & Nourbakhsh, V. (2014). Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: A comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 594-615.

Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic management journal, 21 (10/11): 1105-1121: October-November.

Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line in henriques, a. And richardson, j.(eds); the triple bottom line: Does it all add up. Earth scan, UK.

Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California management review, 45(4), 35-51.

Fernando, Y., & Saththasivam, G. (2017). Green supply chain agility in ems iso 14001 manufacturing firms: Empirical justification of social and environmental performance as an organisational outcome. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(1), 51-69.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 382-388.

Goddard, R., & Villanova, P. (2006). Designing surveys and questionnaires for research. The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants, 114-125.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem): Sage Publications.

Hair, J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Pls-sem or cb-sem: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011a). Pls-sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011b). Pls-sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.

Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.

Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Boone, C.A., & Hill, R.R. (2018). Back in business: Operations research in support of big data analytics for operations and supply chain management. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1-2), 201-211.

Huang, B., Zhao, J., Geng, Y., Tian, Y., & Jiang, P. (2017). Energy-related ghg emissions of the textile industry in china. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 119, 69-77.

Huq, F.A., Chowdhury, I.N., & Klassen, R.D. (2016). Social management capabilities of multinational buying firms and their emerging market suppliers: An exploratory study of the clothing industry. Journal of Operations Management, 46, 19-37.

Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., & Stick, S.L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 3-20.

Khan, H., & Wisner, J.D. (2019). Supply chain integration, learning, and agility: Effects on performance. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 14.

Kim, M., & Chai, S. (2017). The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 42-52.

Kim, M., Song, J., & Triche, J. (2015). Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 533-546.

Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A.J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of management, 36(1), 349-372.

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International journal of innovation management, 5(03), 377-400.

Ma, J., & Kim, H.M. (2016). Predictive model selection for forecasting product returns. Journal of Mechanical Design, 138(5).

Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation. Strategic management journal, 22(5), 387-401.

Mangla, S.K., Govindan, K., & Luthra, S. (2016). Critical success factors for reverse logistics in indian industries: A structural model. Journal of cleaner production, 129, 608-621.

McWaters, S.C., & Hawkins, R. (2018). The imagined contact hypothesis: Prejudice towards asylum seekers in australia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 3, 197-210.

Morgan, S.L., & Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Cambridge University Press.

Pakistan, G.o. (2016). Economic survey of pakistan (2015-2016): Govt. of Pakistan, Economic Advisor’s Wing, Finance Division Islamabad, Pakistan.

Piyathanavong, V., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., & Mangla, S.K. (2019). The adoption of operational environmental sustainability approaches in the thai manufacturing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 507-528.

Roberts, B., & Cohen, M. (2002). Enhancing sustainable development by triple value adding to the core business of government. Economic Development Quarterly, 16(2), 127-137.

Russell, D.M., & Swanson, D. (2019). Transforming information into supply chain agility: An agility adaptation typology. The International Journal of Logistics Management.

Silvestre, B.S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156-169.

Singh, R.K., & Agrawal, S. (2018). Analyzing disposition strategies in reverse supply chains: Fuzzy topsis approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tongco, M.D.C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and applications, 5, 147-158.

Tse, Y.K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & MacBryde, J. (2016). Embracing supply chain agility: An investigation in the electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

Van Wyk, B. (2012). Research design and methods part i. University of Western Cape.

Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E.W., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98-110.

WCED, S.W.S. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17, 1-91.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

Xenochristou, M., Hutton, C., Hofman, J., & Kapelan, Z. (2020). Water demand forecasting accuracy and influencing factors at different spatial scales using a gradient boosting machine. Water Resources Research, 56(8), e2019WR026304.

Zikopoulos, C. (2017). Remanufacturing lotsizing with stochastic lead-time resulting from stochastic quality of returns. International Journal of Production Research, 55(6), 1565-1587.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Haider, H. Z. (2021). Forecasting Product Returns, Supply Chain Agility and Reverse Logistics Performance in the Textile Firms: Structural Equation Modelling. Research Journal of Supply Chain & Business Management, 1(2). Retrieved from